The Chavez/Lindvig scandal continues

The Danish Internet-daily 180grader is now pursuing Danish journalist Niels Lindvig (at government owned DR) for promoting Hugo Chavez’ closure of the private venezuelian television station RCTV.

Lindvig essentially said that it was about time to close the television station since it had been broadcasting lies and in 2002 had supported the coup to oust Chavez. Lindvig even dares to accuse the NGO Reporters Without Borders, which has heavily critized Chavez for his crack-down on free speech, for being financed by “Americans” (namely the allegedly neo-conservative American Enterprises Institute) and therefore being an instrument of the Bush-administration. However, on RWB’s homepage one can see the accounting chart, which lists a variety of private and public donors. The AEI is nowhere to be found, but perhaps they are hiding behind some covert CIA-facade led by Dick Cheney?

Of course, Lindvig is entitled to his ridiculous opinions. The real shameful thing is that all Danes are forced to pay for his left-wing propaganda on public radio.

Meanwhile in Caracas students are protesting Chavez ever-growing dictatorial tendencies – and getting beaten up and shot in return. As Daniel from Venezuela News and Views writes:

There was only one thing missing in Chavez fascist list of accomplishments: shooting peaceful student protests. Yesterday events at Plaza Brion of Chacaito, a central district of Caracas, were another milestone in Chavez descent into petty tyrant status towards open fascism. We even had serious injuries when a group of hooded thugs attacked the pacific rally at University of Carabobo (we must always observe the “courage” of these chavista supporters attacking marches with bandannas or masks on their faces, preferably on fast motorbikes so they can escape, XXI century socialism S.A.).

To have Chavez running Venezuela is a disaster. But to have a Danish journalist on national, public-paid radio support him is simply an outrage. But then again, Lindvig would probably prefer if Denmark went back to the situation before Denmarks Radio had their monopoly broken – which is the same direction Venezuela is heading: Only one station, only one truth.

Why Hugo Chavez was a necessity

We hopefully soon will get rid off. Kevin Grier at Marginal Revolution on why Hugo Chavez was the result of poor governance:

In a kind of a weird back-door way, I also support Hugo Chavez. Or put another way, and going a little Hegelian, as Tyler likes to say, I think Chavez is an historical necessity, and a richly deserved one at that.

Venezuela has relatively high levels of income inequality (a gini coefficient in 2000 of around .44 compared to .36 for the US according to the UN) from a relatively low base and was run by a corrupt elite class who swallowed up oil wealth while the economic standing of the country plummeted. In 1957, Venezuela’s GDP per capita was 51% of the US, in 2003 it stood at 18.5% of the US. Existing institutions had no credibility with a very large portion of the population and simply could not continue to exist as they had.

Don’t get me wrong here, I’m NOT endorsing Hugo. Do I think that Chavez and his policies are going to serve the long term economic interests of Venezuela? NO. Do I think Chavez is a charming guy? NO. Would I be sad if Chavez lost power? NO. If George Bush and Chavez were in a burning building and I could only save one would it be Chavez? NO.

I am just saying that Venezuela was run into the ground by its ruling class and Chavez is the (I hope only temporary) result of their short sighted, poor governance.

The same goes for Evo Morales of Bolivia. Interesting thoughts, and probably true for most of Latin America as well. But that’s no reason not to critizise Chavez for his increasingly dictatorial pretensions.

Utroligt men sandt

Ytringsfrihed gælder ikke, hvis man bedriver dårlig journalistik eller kører kampagne på vegne af oppositionen. Niels Lindvig om Hugo Chavez’ lukning af en privat tv-station.

Niels Lindvig synes det er fuldt berettiget, for stationen RCTV har propaganderet imod Chavez’ nationaliseringer og tidligere agiteret for et kup. Men det han burde have spurgt sig selv er: sker lukningen på et retstatsligt grundlag, som man kan forsvare – fx omfattende injurier eller opfordringer til terror? Lindvigs bergundelser lyder i hvert fald ikke, som om de ville holde i byretten – og der ER jo heller ikke nogen rettergang, bare et præsidentielt dekret. Men hvad, så længe Chavez er en fjende af USA, kan han næppe gøre noget galt. Lindvigs største bekymring: at Chavez vil bekræfte udlandets (ubegrundede, må vi formode) fjendebillede af Chavez, så han ikke vil kunne gennemføre de fantastiske reformer, han allerede er i gang med (fx at nationalisere bankerne, hvilket må rangere som en god idé i Lindvigs bog).

Skam dig, Lindvig! Dine indslag om Latinamerika har længe været fordrejede, men denne gang er du da fuldstændigt ude i hampen. Kan du ikke se, hvor meget du forråder dine egen principper?